Re: [idn] draft about Tradition and Simplified Chinese Conversion[version01]

[YangWoo Ko <newcat@spsoft.co.kr>]

Dear all,

As one of Oct JET meeting attendees, I do not agree with Eric's memory.

On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 07:27:42PM -0500, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote:
> > 2. JET members have adopted these tables, combined them into a single
> > tables.
> That was my understanding at the October JET meeting.

We did not adopt table. What we agreed are as following;

(1) Table proposed by CNNIC/TWNIC should be reviewed by other members
    like KRNIC/JPNIC. KRNIC/JPNIC will submit table revision request.
(2) CNNIC/TWNIC will prepare I-D in two weeks, and other members will
    review it, and CNNIC/TWNIC will submit it no later than cutoff date
    of Salt Lake City IETF meeting.
(3) JET will have another meeting before IETF to get a chance to find
    consensus on CNNIC/TWNIC's proposal. JET meeting will be held today
    Nov 18, 2001.

> > 3. JET members then later remove all conflicting cases with Japanese &
> > Korean pairs from the tables.
> Ditto.

Regarding removal of "conflicting" cases, Yoneya from JPNIC proposed that
"Is it acceptable for CNNIC/TWNIC to remove all entries in which either 
TC or SC is used in Japan ?". But, I have not seen any answer to it.
In Korea, we have not yet submitted any revision request, except removal
of entries in which both TC and SC is used in Korea.

Regards

-- 
/*------------------------------------------------
YangWoo Ko : newcat@spsoft.co.kr
We Invent Enterprise Software Solutions
and Make You Secure & Powerful.
------------------------------------------------*/