Re: [idn] proposed i18n naming rules

["ben" <ben@cc-www.com>]

Hi Liana,

>
> If what you only assume it a label seperator, then it can be treated
> before [nameprep], as part of input buffer/user interface process,
> then it has no need to be mixed with TC/SC insensitizing, or Latin
> case folding.  So do all other forms of label seperators, (though %
or
> $ is not usally label a seperator), may be treated in the same way
as
> "Chinese full stop" , thus they also excluded from [nameprep].
>
> Liana
>

It was first brought up by Eric H in this thread who said, " U+002E
(FULL STOP) is ONLY valid for use as a separator when the IHI is
written out".  I thought it will be a good time to draw the same
attention to the "Chinese Full Stop" for this WG to consider.  (To
clarify, I am most definitely *not* pushing for it to become legal
data.)

Thanks,
Ben