Re: [idn] idn wg proposed agenda

[Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>]

Marc,

do any of these drafts have the support of more than 7 folks in the
working group?

>   draft-ietf-idn-lsb-ace-02.txt: 10 min.
>   draft-ietf-idn-jpchar-01.txt
>   draft-ietf-idn-hangeulchar-00.txt
>   draft-ietf-idn-tsconv-02.txt
>   draft-hall-dm-idns-00.txt

I didn't attend London, but I'm tired of attending nearly useless IDN
meetings. Having time allotted to little review sessions of drafts that
have little or no support is a real waste of everyones time.

We have allot of market pressure to finish but our chairs apparently don't
see the value in closure.

I recommend the chairs rethink the agenda removing the drafts without
serious support and allot as much time as possible to discussion. Please
trim down the time allocated to "next steps" and "document status."

We need to bring some closure to this or the registries will do it for us.

-rick

Rick Wesson
CTO, DNSO Registrars Constituency