Re: [idn] idn wg proposed agenda

["James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

> I didn't attend London, but I'm tired of attending nearly useless IDN
> meetings. Having time allotted to little review sessions of drafts
that
> have little or no support is a real waste of everyones time.

draft within the pool all have indication of 7 supporters. Please refer
to http://www.i-d-n.net/ if you wish to see the list of supporters.

> We have allot of market pressure to finish but our chairs apparently
don't
> see the value in closure.

Market pressure is only one of aspect the aspect the group have to
consider. It may be significant to you but not be so to others.

The job of the chairs is to gather rough consensus and move them
forward. And the advises Marc and myself got is to "take as long as it
takes to get rough consensus but not one day more".

If your complains is that the group is not reaching rough consensus fast
enough for your market demand, then the complaint should be directed to
the group, not the chairs.

If you think there is rough consensus but the chairs, for some reasons,
is not moving it forward, then please provide your proof.

Otherwise, justify your accussation that the chairs "apparently don't
see the value in closure", or withdraw it.

-James Seng