Re: [idn] idn wg proposed agenda

[John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>]

Ben, Rick, and anyone else relevant:

I've seen no evidence that James's behavior is motivated by
either his own or his company's profit motives, and some
evidence to the contrary.  It is legitimate to question whether
he (or Marc) are making the best decisions.  But, unless you
have real evidence of self-interested misbehavior, let's stop it
with this type of personal attack.  Or, if you do have such
evidence, please bring it to the attention of the ADs who, I'm
sure, would deal with it appropriately.

   john


--On Thursday, 06 December, 2001 08:44 -0500 ben
<ben@cc-www.com> wrote:

> Hi Rick,
> 
> From: "Rick H Wesson" <wessorh@ar.com>
> 
>> james, its a flag you and your company have waved for a long
>> time
> you
>> understand the situation better than most; infact doesn't
>> idns.net
> profit
>> from the current market conditions? well, i guess we all do
>> too, but
> we
>> still need to resolve IDN.
>> 
> 
> I have often asked, "how is it possible for people to delay the
> progress of this WG by simply posting up messages or writing
> drafts?"
> 
> So I ask a similiar question, "how is it possible for the
> chair to delay the progress of this WG for his own benefit?"
> 
> Long long time ago, a very wise and old man in China said
> something very wise that can be roughly translated as... "you
> can only bring the horse to the water, but you can't make it
> drink."
> 
> Thanks,
> Ben
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>