[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] idn wg proposed agenda



Rick,

Pointless arguments, especially your comments on my company is totally
irrelevant to this working group. If you have constructive things to
say, then bring it out. Attacks on the chairs, the group, or your
competitors here is not what I expect an experience IETFer like yourself
would do.

But it would be totally irresponsible for the co-chairs to declare rough
consensus, when we there is none yet, just to prove you wrong. So don't
count on it. It does not work that way and vice versa.

-James Seng

> > Otherwise, justify your accussation that the chairs "apparently
don't
> > see the value in closure", or withdraw it.
>
> james, i don't have to; either you will prove my point by not building
> consensus and not moving us closer and loosing us in a miriad of
> presentations of drafts we all should have read
>  -or-
> you will help move this working group forward by providing time for
> discussion instead of a litany of draft presentations
>
> its time the rubber hits the road, james, and we make some decisions,
and
> to do so we need time for debate.