Re: [idn] Future of the requirements document

[David Hopwood <david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote:
> I suggest that David Hopwood and I take on the responsibility of
> being editors of the requirements draft, and that he and I bear the
> responsibility for ensuring that only the necessary WG time is used
> to make only the necessary changes in the requirements draft. I've
> not asked David, but I have seen his note of today, and his prior
> notes, both on changes and the frustration with non-response.

I'd just like to confirm that I'm happy to act as a co-editor for this
document (whether the current editors' names continue to be attached to
it or not).

- -- 
David Hopwood <david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk>

Home page & PGP public key: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hopwood/
RSA 2048-bit; fingerprint 71 8E A6 23 0E D3 4C E5  0F 69 8C D4 FA 66 15 01
Nothing in this message is intended to be legally binding. If I revoke a
public key but refuse to specify why, it is because the private key has been
seized under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act; see www.fipr.org/rip


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBPBac8zkCAxeYt5gVAQETbggAtRMfT1Db079N6TLY/1D+a6wY8tUaIFDH
0eiNtNrbzl7bQV2m/Fa7I3OiKemlb7l1cAx6uNehtJOdQl1joUgYmEQnQxZjViHd
W2sMEvJco+uRDivVYR6gcVe1B2KrcaehqDM8uDq2loopLHXp+CqlaQxVKsf280ry
Hhns/dNxTGe0WGX+6cBtxBWgQtIgtkBkYx/tFLd+KJgu4/ndLhlehEVK3+4A+Jxu
WqwVqhmSZlI6xuWUfxS1kJOmv5lHkOFPWZzyf62lKDpzdlvagxAWYgeTxFy/boHv
jXJiwFxEH0RoRvfDIzZt9AQc9TE80g0B46uUqld+qkohuhMUMoJgTg==
=x0AI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----