Re: Inputting mixed SC/TC (Re: [idn] A question...)

["James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

Same old discussion. Response is already in the archive
http://www.imc.org/idn/mail-archive/msg04621.html

-James Seng

----- Original Message -----
From: "xiang deng" <deng@cnnic.net.cn>
To: <Ted.Hardie@nominum.com>; "Chun-Hsin Wu" <wuch@gate.sinica.edu.tw>
Cc: "James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>; <idn@ops.ietf.org>;
<jw-lin@yahoo.com.tw>
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: Inputting mixed SC/TC (Re: [idn] A question...)


> Dear Ted,
>
> Thanks for your comment.
> Discussion make issue more clearly.
>
> we are clear:
> 1. Current IDNA is a good solution.
> 2. IDNA ONLY will be detrimental to Chinese Internet Community.
> 3. IDN WG chairs' express: it's out of scope. But decision maker is
not
>     family with Chinese character and never use Chinese character in
daily life.
> 4. Chinese Internet community object IDNA ONLY solution.
> 5. Unicode haven't finish the equivalent set of Chinese character.
>
> from 1. we get:  It's based on all member's hard work.
> from 2. we get:  IDNA ONLY is not enough to solve Chinese character
issue.
> from 3. we get:  If IDN WG chairs don't consider the detriment,
Chinese.
> Internet Community have responsibility to solve it for Chinese
Internet future
> and Chinese users before the detriment become true.
> from 4. we get:  IDNA ONLY solution lost the basis to be widely
applicated.
> from 5. we get:  If Unicode begin this work, it'll refer to "A
complete set of Chinese
> Simplified Character", so it is a good beginning of next step.
>
> Best regards
> Deng xiang
>