[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] Chinese Domain Name Consortium (CDNC) Declaration
- To: phoffman@imc.org
- Subject: Re: [idn] Chinese Domain Name Consortium (CDNC) Declaration
- From: liana Ye <liana.ydisg@juno.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 02:16:39 -0800
- Cc: idn@ops.ietf.org, Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr, Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca, ajm@icann.org, erin@twnic.net.tw, fred@cisco.com, harald@alvestrand.no, htk@eecs.harvard.edu, iab@ISI.EDU, iesg@ietf.org, jet-member@nic.ad.jp, jseng@pobox.org.sg, lynn@icann.org, mkatoh@mkatoh.net, mkatoh@wdc.fujitsu.com, mouhamet@next.sn, narten@us.ibm.com, nordmark@eng.sun.com, paf@cisco.com, qhhu@public.bta.net.cn, sharil@cmc.gov.my, shkyong@kgsm.kaist.ac.kr, vcerf@mci.net, alanysho@hkdnr.net.hk, christine.tsang@hkdnr.net.hk, deng@cnnic.net.cn, hlqian@cnnic.net.cn, hoho@iis.sinica.edu.tw, huangk@alum.sinica.edu, jasonho@umac.mo, lee@whale.cnnic.net.cn, mao@cnnic.net.cn, snw@twnic.net.tw, sstseng@twnic.net.tw, tsenglm@cc.ncu.edu.tw, whzhang@cnnnic.net.cn, wschen@twnic.net.tw, wuch@gate.sinica.edu.tw, yktham@umac.mo
I just have to comment on your impression:
It is not the whole picture!
> Due to the efforts of some CDNC members, the IETF is now well aware
> of the "2^n" variant problem that is unique to the use of Han
> characters in the Chinese language. Fortunately, using registration
> guidelines will solve the problem. The only people seriously affected
> by the size of DNS zones created by the "2^n" problem will be very
> large, flat zones such as those managed by CDNC members, but they
> are able to compensate for the size of zones with no changes to the
DNS
> protocols.
> Of course, the character variant problem exists in many different
> languages, not just in Chinese. Because of this, each registry or
> zone that includes IDN names needs to make decisions about name
> equivalence (and therefore multiple registrations) before they enter
> any IDN names into their zone. Based on this input during Working
> Group last call from the CDNC, it seems clear that we need to
> explain
> these points more in the IDNA document.
>
This provide another form of fragmented IDN.
Thanks.
Liana