Re: Inputting mixed SC/TC (Re: [idn] A question...)

["D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>]

Patrik writes:
> You just asked for "certain mappings and no others".

Liar. I started by quoting two lines from Klensin saying that TC/SC was
``not analogous to case-mapping.'' I then quoted Seng's TC/SC response,
and said ``This answer destroys the stated reasons for case-mapping.''

> I don't understand where you get "lying" from?

I attribute your behavior to malice because it cannot be adequately
explained by stupidity. It is simply not possible to read my message
without observing that I was talking about case-mapping.

This is not the first time that you have blatantly misrepresented the
statements of people who object to IDNA.

I have heard, by the way, that some of your company's products are not
8-bit-clean: in particular, they fail to handle UTF-8 transparently. Is
this true? Your position on the IESG gives you substantial power to
elevate your company's interests above the interests of the community;
you have a clear conflict of interest if you are making decisions on
proposals that affect your company's products.

---D. J. Bernstein, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics,
Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago