Re: Inputting mixed SC/TC (Re: [idn] A question...)

["James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

Dan,

It is my responsibility to remind you of your language in the group.

Disagreement is okay. Arguments over technical point is typical. But
lets keep it away from ad hominem attack.

-James Seng

----- Original Message -----
From: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
To: <idn@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: Inputting mixed SC/TC (Re: [idn] A question...)


> Patrik writes:
> > You just asked for "certain mappings and no others".
>
> Liar. I started by quoting two lines from Klensin saying that TC/SC
was
> ``not analogous to case-mapping.'' I then quoted Seng's TC/SC
response,
> and said ``This answer destroys the stated reasons for case-mapping.''
>
> > I don't understand where you get "lying" from?
>
> I attribute your behavior to malice because it cannot be adequately
> explained by stupidity. It is simply not possible to read my message
> without observing that I was talking about case-mapping.
>
> This is not the first time that you have blatantly misrepresented the
> statements of people who object to IDNA.
>
> I have heard, by the way, that some of your company's products are not
> 8-bit-clean: in particular, they fail to handle UTF-8 transparently.
Is
> this true? Your position on the IESG gives you substantial power to
> elevate your company's interests above the interests of the community;
> you have a clear conflict of interest if you are making decisions on
> proposals that affect your company's products.
>
> ---D. J. Bernstein, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics,
> Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago
>