Re: [idn] Re: 7 bits forever!

["Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>]

James Seng wrote:

> It is also okay if you wish to start from UDNS, a draft which I find
> it is reasonable altho incomplete. Talk to Oscarsson if you wish but
> lets put it down in writing.

Dan should certainly be encouraged to resubmit his UDNS proposal, but in
the meantime, I would like to point out that draft-hall-dm-idns-00.txt is
the dual-mode draft that is currently in the WG pool. Perhaps your
confusion stems from the I-D-N.net web site, which still lists UDNS as an
active document, and which does not list DM-IDNS.

[For the record, message <016c01c14c76$ea176c20$dd00a8c0@jamessonyvaio>
shows that UDNS was removed from the pool on Oct 4, 2001 while message
<023301c172ee$62f4fc50$0701000a@jamessonyvaio> shows that DM-IDNS was
accepted into the WG pool on Nov 22, 2001. Don't rely on the web site.]

-- 
Eric A. Hall                                        http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols          http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/