Re: [idn] Re: 7 bits forever!

["James Seng" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

My apologises.

Let me correct myself: DM-IDNS or UDNS are both good starting point, one
which the UTF-8 supportor group should go aside and finish it.

-James Seng

> James Seng wrote:
>
> > It is also okay if you wish to start from UDNS, a draft which I find
> > it is reasonable altho incomplete. Talk to Oscarsson if you wish but
> > lets put it down in writing.
>
> Dan should certainly be encouraged to resubmit his UDNS proposal, but in
> the meantime, I would like to point out that draft-hall-dm-idns-00.txt is
> the dual-mode draft that is currently in the WG pool. Perhaps your
> confusion stems from the I-D-N.net web site, which still lists UDNS as an
> active document, and which does not list DM-IDNS.
>
> [For the record, message <016c01c14c76$ea176c20$dd00a8c0@jamessonyvaio>
> shows that UDNS was removed from the pool on Oct 4, 2001 while message
> <023301c172ee$62f4fc50$0701000a@jamessonyvaio> shows that DM-IDNS was
> accepted into the WG pool on Nov 22, 2001. Don't rely on the web site.]
>
> --
> Eric A. Hall                                        http://www.ehsco.com/
> Internet Core Protocols          http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/