Re: [idn] Document Status?

[Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>]

> The first paragraph of your note said that the IESG had discussed 
> stringprep.  Having the IESG discuss that one document, without discussing 
> it in the context of the others, did not seem possible.

Sorry for the confusion.

The stringprep document was done as a separate IETF wide last call
and it is going through the IESG review separately.
This split was made to limit the possibility that stringprep, which is
needed by other WGs such as ips, be unnecessarily held up due to
concerns with IDN(A).

Thus stringprep has been discussed by the IESG, and the other 3 documents
is on the IESG agenda for tomorrow.

  Erik