[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] Document Status?

To: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>
Subject: Re: [idn] Document Status?
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 07:05:17 -0700
Cc: "'idn@ops.ietf.org'" <idn@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1031145960.3572.nordmark@bebop.france>
References: <"Your message with ID" <5.1.1.2.2.20020903092739.02642f70@jay.songbird.com>

At 03:26 PM 9/4/2002 +0200, Erik Nordmark wrote:

This split was made to limit the possibility that stringprep, which is
needed by other WGs such as ips, be unnecessarily held up due to
concerns with IDN(A).


cool.  tnx.

d/


----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dave@tribalwise.com>
TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850

References:
- Re: [idn] Document Status?
  - From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
- Re: [idn] Document Status?
  - From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [idn] Document Status?
Next by Date: Re: [idn] IDNA text presentation (was Document Status?)
Previous by thread: Re: [idn] Document Status?
Next by thread: Re: [idn] Document Status?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread