Re: [idn] IDN eamples for testing

["Edmon Chung" <edmon@neteka.com>]

This is actually an interesting question. Since we know that there are
actually quite a bunch of clients out there that uses bq--RACE, do we think
that those testbeds (such as in the case of JPRS) should keep bq--RACE in
the zone (together with xn--punycode) for a while for transitional purposes?
Or must this be considered non-conformant to the standards?
Edmon


----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin v. Löwis" <martin@v.loewis.de>
To: "Ric Johnson" <RicJohnsonIII@hotmail.com>
Cc: "IDN" <idn@ops.ietf.org>; "Martin Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 1:46 AM
Subject: Re: [idn] IDN eamples for testing


> "Ric Johnson" <RicJohnsonIII@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> > U+0192
> >
> > bq--agja.mltbd.com
>
> These are not, of course, in conformance with the RFCs. IDNA uses the
> xn-- prefix and punycode, instead of using RACE. So the Verisign
> testbed should be considered proprietary now, until it is upgrade to
> support the adopted standards.
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
>