[idn] Re: IDN Registration Integrity

["AM" <amitbusy@hotmail.com>]

charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-idn@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

AM
amitbusy@hotmail.com
Re: IDN Registration Integrity


As an individual concerned with the future of IDNs, I would like to
recommend that ICANN seriously consider incorporating a clause in their
registry agreements that ensures registrants that their IDN =
registrations
will be valid through all changes in registry operators, through all
standards' progressions, through to the day when multi-lingual domains =
will
be incorporated into zone files as are ASCII domains.

Though confident in ICANN, the IETF, and Registry Operators, individuals =
are
concerned that their IDNs are the work of proprietary standards put =
forth by
the Registry Operators.  Plug-in applications used as a link between =
ASCII
names and their multi-lingual equivalents further this suspicion.  =
Though
the suspicion is false, I learned the truth only after speaking to a =
number
of individuals at my registrar, Verisign-GRS, ICANN and the IETF working
group.  Still, they could not be completely certain that "your name =
would
always be your name." =20

The question at hand is are my current IDN registrations so-called
"ICANN-certified" registrations, as are the ASCII domains of today?  In
ASCII registrations, I am confident that through all registry operator
changes, through any accidental deletions or transfers of my domain, I =
can
be assured that my domain name will be valid and governed by ICANN =
policies.
I would like to be assured that not just my ASCII "bq--" or "xn--" =
string
will be "ICANN-certified" but that its multi-lingual equivalent will =
always
be a constant registration, valid and governed by ICANN policies, =
through to
the day when multi-lingual domains will be incorporated into zone files =
as
are ASCII domains.

Again, after learning about the issue, I am most confident that "my
registration will most likely always be my registration."  This is =
probably
not a major issue.  Still, it may be worth clarification from ICANN.  =
Any
discussions or statements by the applicable IDN committees in future
meetings would be most appreciated.

Thank you for your consideration.



Best wishes,
AM


----- Original Message -----
From: <owner-idn@ops.ietf.org>
To: <jseng@pobox.org.sg>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:45 AM
Subject: BOUNCE idn@ops.ietf.org: Non-member submission from ["AM"
<amitbusy@hotmail.com>]


> From amitbusy@hotmail.com Wed Mar 26 18:45:02 2003
> Received: from dav42.sea1.hotmail.com ([207.68.162.100] helo=hotmail.com)
> by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
> id 18yNO1-000F3k-00
> for idn@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 18:45:01 -0800
> Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
> Wed, 26 Mar 2003 18:45:01 -0800
> Received: from 68.63.184.139 by dav42.sea1.hotmail.com with DAV;
> Thu, 27 Mar 2003 02:44:56 +0000
> X-Originating-IP: [68.63.184.139]
> X-Originating-Email: [amitbusy@hotmail.com]
> From: "AM" <amitbusy@hotmail.com>
> To: <amitbusy@hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: IDN Registration Integrity
> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 19:44:48 -0700
> Message-ID: <000001c2f40a$d571cad0$8bb83f44@cc634135b>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
> Importance: Normal
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Mar 2003 02:45:01.0077 (UTC)
FILETIME=[DCC87450:01C2F40A]
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0
> tests=BAYES_10
> version=2.50
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)
>
> AM
> amitbusy@hotmail.com
> Re: IDN Registration Integrity
>
>
> As an individual concerned with the future of IDNs, I would like to
> recommend that ICANN seriously consider incorporating a clause in their
> registry agreements that ensures registrants that their IDN =
> registrations
> will be valid through all changes in registry operators, through all
> standards' progressions, through to the day when multi-lingual domains =
> will
> be incorporated into zone files as are ASCII domains.
>
> Though confident in ICANN, the IETF, and Registry Operators, individuals =
> are
> concerned that their IDNs are the work of proprietary standards put =
> forth by
> the Registry Operators.  Plug-in applications used as a link between =
> ASCII
> names and their multi-lingual equivalents further this suspicion.  =
> Though
> the suspicion is false, I learned the truth only after speaking to a =
> number
> of individuals at my registrar, Verisign-GRS, ICANN and the IETF working
> group.  Still, they could not be completely certain that "your name =
> would
> always be your name." =20
>
> The question at hand is are my current IDN registrations so-called
> "ICANN-certified" registrations, as are the ASCII domains of today?  In
> ASCII registrations, I am confident that through all registry operator
> changes, through any accidental deletions or transfers of my domain, I =
> can
> be assured that my domain name will be valid and governed by ICANN =
> policies.
> I would like to be assured that not just my ASCII "bq--" or "xn--" =
> string
> will be "ICANN-certified" but that its multi-lingual equivalent will =
> always
> be a constant registration, valid and governed by ICANN policies, =
> through to
> the day when multi-lingual domains will be incorporated into zone files =
> as
> are ASCII domains.
>
> Again, after learning about the issue, I am most confident that "my
> registration will most likely always be my registration."  This is =
> probably
> not a major issue.  Still, it may be worth clarification from ICANN.  =
> Any
> discussions or statements by the applicable IDN committees in future
> meetings would be most appreciated.
>
> Thank you for your consideration.
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
> AM
>
>