[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] Re: IDN Registration Integrity



The number of ccTLDs that have a contract with ICANN is however quite small.
;-)
http://www.icann.org/cctlds/



----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam M. Costello" <idn.amc+0@nicemice.net.RemoveThisWord>
To: "IETF idn working group" <idn@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 6:32 AM
Subject: Re: [idn] Re: IDN Registration Integrity


> "Martin v. Löwis" <martin@v.loewis.de> wrote:
>
> > > Under some TLDs, yes, but last I heard ICANN was not yet allowing
> > > xn-- registrations under any TLD whose registry had signed a
> > > contract with ICANN, which includes all the gTLDs and some ccTLDs
> > > (like .jp).
> >
> > Very interesting.  Was this published anywhere?  What is the
> > rationale?
>
> http://www.icann.org/riodejaneiro/idn-topic.htm
>
> Note that that is not the only point of view on the subject of IDN
> registration policy.  See also:
>
> http://www.imc.org/idn-reg-policy/
>
> AMC
>
>