[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: FW: FlowId and FlowIdOrAny
I would think that if flowID is needed in INDEX clause
one would use FlowId and not FlowIdOrAny
Same issue exists for example for Dscp and DscpOrAny in
the DIFFSERV-TC-MIB
Thanks,
Bert
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Presuhn [mailto:randy_presuhn@mindspring.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 28 januari 2003 1:20
> To: mibs@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: FW: FlowId and FlowIdOrAny
>
>
> Hi -
>
> > From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
> > To: <mibs@ops.ietf.org>
> > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:57 PM
> > Subject: FW: FW: FlowId and FlowIdOrAny
> >
>
> > Just in case any of you has a comment or concern
> ...
> > FlowIdOrAny TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
> > DISPLAY-HINT "d"
> > STATUS current
> > DESCRIPTION "The flow identifier or flow lable in an IPv6
> > header that may be used to discriminate traffic
> > flows. The value of -1 is used to indicate a
> > wildcard, i.e. any value.
> > "
> > SYNTAX Integer32 (-1 | 0..1048575)
> ...
>
> Does it worry anyone else that objects defined using this TC would
> not be usable in INDEX clauses?
>
> Randy
>
>
>