RE: FW: FlowId and FlowIdOrAny

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

I actually did send of an email to one of the authors
(Brian) and one IPv6 WG chair (Margaret) to ask if
such would be a good idea. We'll see how they answer.

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de]
> Sent: dinsdag 28 januari 2003 14:26
> To: bwijnen@lucent.com
> Cc: mibs@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: FW: FlowId and FlowIdOrAny
> 
> 
> 
> >>>>> Wijnen, Bert (Bert) writes:
> 
> Bert> W.r.t. the 3rd point, that is exactly why I want the IPv6 WG to
> Bert> check on this. Maybe they should own the document that creates
> Bert> the new TCs.  In fact Biran Carpenter posted to diffserv/rap
> Bert> mailing lists that the IPv6 has not finalized tehir I-D on what
> Bert> exactly the IPv6 flowLabel field is/contains. So I have asked
> Bert> him and IPv6 chair when we can expect the final word.
> 
> The relevant document seems to be draft-ietf-ipv6-flow-label-04.txt
> and I am wondering if it is not possible to actually put the MIB
> module which defines the TCs for flow lables right into this same
> document.
> 
> Note that this document also has text about filters which others might
> find interesting since I do not recall that MIBs/PIBs talk about how
> you deal with packets where information is missing...
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder    
> <http://www.informatik.uni-osnabrueck.de/schoenw/>
> 
>