[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questions on the Draft
- To: <more@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: Questions on the Draft
- From: "Atsushi Takeshita" <takeshita@dcl.docomo-usa.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:04:09 -0700
- Delivery-date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:02:46 -0700
- Envelope-to: more-data@psg.com
James,
> 3) pg. 7 The Accounting section doesn't mention either of the two
> accounting protocols, Radius or Diameter. Since this document is
> meant to be foward looking, probably Diameter should be favored.
I think Radius and Diameter are not requirements but examples of the
solution.
Does this I-D need to mention them?
> 4) pg. 8 Do you want to be able to charge on packet content? This
> could result in *very* slow performance in some cases, if you
> need to snoop through to L4 to determine the port number.
My personal opinion is that many or some operator will
prefer the idea of chaging on packet content
unless they find better charging method.
------------------------------------------
TAKESHITA, Atsushi
DoCoMo Communications Laboratories USA, Inc.
takeshita@dcl.docomo-usa.com
Tel: 408-451-4705 / Fax: 408-573-1090
------------------------------------------