Re: [802.1] P802.1b/D0

["Randy Presuhn" <rpresuhn@bmc.com>]

Hi -

> From: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>
> To: "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
> Cc: "Dan Romascanu (Dan) (E-mail)" <dromasca@avaya.com>; "Les Bell
(E-mail)" <Les_Bell@eur.3com.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 12:39 PM
> Subject: RE: [802.1] P802.1b/D0
...
> If different OID values are being used for the "same" object
> type definitions, then this is illegal, and the result is
> non-interoperation
...

How is this any different from when we take a MIB module that's been
under "experimental" and publish identical definitions under, for example,
mib-2?  I don't recall seeing this line of argumentation in the course of
the thread "What to do when moving from experimental to PS" in October.

Randy