RE: FW: [802.1] P802.1b/D0

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

> On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, David T. Perkins wrote:
> > New definitions to "tidy up" most likely have higher costs
> > than what ever benefit they provide.
> 
> I most certainly agree with that.  Especially if the old definitions
> have seen significant deployment in the field.  I've seen some
> discussion along these lines in the IPCDN mail archive, and I hope
> that they keep this in mind.
> 
Right, we have a STRONG request from the author of RFC2786
to keep the MIB (even we we go stds track) under the experimental
tree because it has already been very weidely deployed.

So I was kind of suprised with this IEEE idea to just move them

Bert
> //cmh
> 
>