RE: FW: [802.1] P802.1b/D0

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

> > 
> > Please note that if the definitions were under experimental and
> > widely deployed, then there was either:
> > 1) a break down in the standards process,
> > 2) a vendor (or vendors) abusing the standards process, or
> > 3) a little of both.
> 
> I think that (3) is what happened in the case of RFC 2786.
> 
Well, I think I told them back then that they could not be stds track
And they were happy with experimental and so went ahead, defined it,
implemented it and deployed it. And the deployment seems to be a
great success... so what can we say?

Bert
> //cmh
> 
>