reviewer guidelines

["Harrington, David" <dbh@enterasys.com>]

Hi,

I found a couple nits in the 00pre0 reviewer guidelines.

section 4.3 talks about "standard" objects being under { iso 3 6 1 2 }. I will point out that that subtree is for IETF standard objects. Other organizations, such as IEEE also produce standards, and they can assign them under their own "standard" branches that apparently are not under IANA control.

Paragraph two of that section says "Experience has shown that is impractical objects from one subtree to another once those objects have seen ..." - dat ain't good English.

section 4.5 mentions transmission, but doesn't provide the OID for transmission of from which mib it should be imported.

section 4.5 "under under"

4.6.1.1 "is a direct translation the definitions" is missing an "of"

4.6.1.2 "there is a requirement MUST reset" needs extra words.

4.6.1.3 "that that objects"

Appendix A: "maintanance" s/b maintenance

"review the actual technical for" is missing "content"

Informative References: need to be updated to the RFC341x documents.

Informative References: the formatting of [RFC2863] needs to be fixed.


dbh