Re: reviewer guidelines

["C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>]

On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Harrington, David wrote:
> 
> I found a couple nits in the 00pre0 reviewer guidelines.

Thank you.

> section 4.3 talks about "standard" objects being under
> { iso 3 6 1 2 }.  I will point out that that subtree is
> for IETF standard objects. Other organizations, such as IEEE
> also produce standards, and they can assign them under their own
> "standard" branches that apparently are not under IANA control.

This is true. I lifted the term "standard" (quotes and all) from RFC
2578 and kin.  Would it suffice if I add some words to Section 2,
"Terminology", to clarify that "standard" means "IETF standard"?

[ Remainder of bugs snipped, thanks for finding them. ]

//cmh

P.S.  I plan to have the -00 version out well in advance of the
cutoff for the next IETF.  I imagine Bert will fire me (or at
least give me a very bad performance review) if I don't :)