RE: Section 4.6.5 [was: 4.5] OID size limits

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

wfm

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Presuhn [mailto:randy_presuhn@mindspring.com]
> Sent: maandag 17 februari 2003 23:24
> To: Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Section 4.6.5 [was: 4.5] OID size limits
> 
> 
> Hi -
> 
> > From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
> > To: "Mreview (E-mail)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
> > Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 2:03 PM
> > Subject: Re: Section 4.6.5 [was: 4.5] OID size limits
> ...
> > All other things being equal, I'd prefer to see static SIZE 
> restrictions
> > to enforce the 128 subid cap.  But it's easy to see that 
> there are cases
> > where this will not work because it will be too strict.  
> Specifically,
> ...
> > However, I don't want to be quite so specific the 
> guidelines document
> > for fear of crossing the line into CLR-dom.
> ...
> 
> Depending on the kind of access control policies envisioned for the
> tables in question, a 128 subid cap may be not strict enough. 
>  However,
> I agree that there's danger of wandering into CLR-land, and think
> that the text you propose is good enough and we should move on.
> 
> Randy
> 
> 
> 
>