RE: ID-nits

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

So I will wait till next week before I ask iesg secretariat
to make yet anotehr change. 

Oh... you migth say... but there is a change in the queue
already, why do you not make them do the proper thing right
away?

My experience is that they will probably screw it up even more.
So... I'll do this sequentially

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de]
> Sent: woensdag 19 februari 2003 12:55
> To: heard@pobox.com
> Cc: mreview@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: ID-nits
> 
> 
> 
> >>>>> C M Heard writes:
> 
> Mike> Such as the "differs only in case" warning?
> 
> I think so. The idea would be that smilint -l 6 by default produces
> all the warnings the MIB review guidelines considere useful and that
> any additional "esoteric" warnings come out if you use -l 7 (or
> higher).  I have brought this up on the smilint mailing list and if
> everybody agrees, I will implement this next week.
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder    
> <http://www.informatik.uni-osnabrueck.de/schoenw/>
>