[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ID-nits

To: heard@pobox.com
Subject: Re: ID-nits
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:54:58 +0100
Cc: mreview@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10302180944050.4494-100000@shell4.bayarea.net>(heard@pobox.com)
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10302180944050.4494-100000@shell4.bayarea.net>

>>>>> C M Heard writes:

Mike> Such as the "differs only in case" warning?

I think so. The idea would be that smilint -l 6 by default produces
all the warnings the MIB review guidelines considere useful and that
any additional "esoteric" warnings come out if you use -l 7 (or
higher).  I have brought this up on the smilint mailing list and if
everybody agrees, I will implement this next week.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder    <http://www.informatik.uni-osnabrueck.de/schoenw/>

References:
- Re: ID-nits
  - From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>

Prev by Date: RE: time to say "good enough"?
Next by Date: RE: ID-nits
Previous by thread: Re: ID-nits
Next by thread: RE: ID-nits
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread