RE: PerfHist counters

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

I guess you mean RFC2493 (not 2934) ?

I believe that atommib is doing just clarifications and such
and wants to advance to DS

I believe that adslmib is extending (adding objects) for
64bit values. That would prevent from advancing to DS,
and ATOMMIB has another MIb that wants to go DS that 
depends on 2493 if I remember well.

I think that Mike Heard has all the details in his head
w.r.t. atommib work.

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harrington, David [mailto:dbh@enterasys.com]
> Sent: woensdag 12 maart 2003 14:32
> To: MReview (E-mail)
> Subject: PerfHist counters
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I see two I-Ds that are proposing modifications to RFC2943, 
> one done by adslmib and the other by atommib. Should we get 
> these two groups to work together on one document?
> 
> dbh
> 
> David Harrington
> Network Management Architect
> Office of the CTO
> Enterasys Networks
>  
>