[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
FW: WG Last Call: a batch of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-*01 documents (fwd)
- To: "Mreview (E-mail)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: FW: WG Last Call: a batch of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-*01 documents (fwd)
- From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 15:51:34 +0200
One question that I got asked is:
Do the MIB doctors want to take a look at it and recommend
action items for all the MIB documents that do not support
IPv6. The actions (potentially added as recommendations or
notes to the document) could be:
- do nothing
- declare historic
- update/obsolete
- it is an IPv4 specific thing so no need to be IPv6 capable.
- other
What do we think?
Thanks,
Bert
-----Original Message-----
From: Pekka Savola [mailto:pekkas@netcore.fi]
Sent: dinsdag 22 juli 2003 12:04
To: ops-area@ops.ietf.org; ops-chairs@ietf.org
Cc: bob@thefinks.com; mrw@windriver.com; andreas.bergstrom@hiof.no
Subject: WG Last Call: a batch of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-*01
documents (fwd)
FYI;
Feedback & Review is sought. Please take a look at the ops IPv4 survey
document:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-ops-01.txt
It's very very short; please send feedback. In particular, it would be
good to identify specifications which have incorrect information, or
specifications which are not longer relevant and could be moved to
historic (if someone bothered to do that, but that's a different topic),
or the like.
Thanks,
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 12:41:48 +0300 (EEST)
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Cc: bob@thefinks.com, mrw@windriver.com, andreas.bergstrom@hiof.no
Subject: WG Last Call: a batch of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-*01 documents
Hi all,
This is a WG Last Call for comments on sending the following first three
"Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Standards" documents
to the IESG for consideration as Informational RFCs:
Introduction to the Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently
Deployed IETF Standards
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-intro-01.txt
Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Sub-IP Area Standards
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-subip-01.txt
Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Operations &
Management Area Standards
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-ops-01.txt
Please review these documents carefully, and send your feedback to the
list (editorial modifications may also be sent to the editor, Andreas).
Please also indicate whether or not you believe that this document is
ready to go to the IESG. Silence does NOT indicate consent. Unless
sufficient support is demonstrated on the list, the documents will not be
send to the IESG.
Please note that the first document ("introduction") includes the summary
of all the results, which are subject to change; please ignore the details
of section 3 when reviewing it.
The last call will end in 3 weeks, on 12th August.
Pekka, Margaret & Bob