RE: Adding PhysicalIndex/PhysicalIndexOrZero to guidelines Append ix D

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

I would not state that some web page contains a "complete list"
but rather a "more up to date list". They should be well defined
and generic TCs. Not all sorts of spcific TCs.

I propose that anyone can suggest additons via the MREVIEW list and
that the MIB doctors evaluate. We could also at or around every IETF 
do a re-avaluation of the list and check if additions are needed.

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de]
> Sent: woensdag 23 juli 2003 9:52
> To: C. M. Heard
> Cc: Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Adding PhysicalIndex/PhysicalIndexOrZero to guidelines
> Append ix D
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:10:57AM -0700, C. M. Heard wrote:
> 
> [...]
>  
> > Juergen, would Bert's suggestion address your concerns?
> 
> The whole thing about such web pages is that someone must maintain it
> and that it must be clear how the pages are updated. Is the editor of
> such a web page free to make updates as he/she sees reasonable? Should
> there be a process that the contents is checked regularily to make
> sure it stays up to date? I am not asking for a heavy weight procedure
> but at least some discussion how to implement this I think is 
> necessary.
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
> <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 
> 28725 Bremen, Germany
>