[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FW: Last Call: 'Operational Security Requirements for IP Network Infrastructure' to BCP

To: "Mreview (E-mail)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: FW: Last Call: 'Operational Security Requirements for IP Network Infrastructure' to BCP
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 20:29:20 -0800 (PST)
In-reply-to: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155032D9E78@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>

On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> I think this doc should be reviewed by a few MIB doctors too!
> If you can, please do and let me know.

I did not have time to do a real review, but I did try to look for
MIB-specific issues.  However, I could not find any mention of the
word "MIB" at all, and SNMP is mentioned only as an example.

//cmh

References:
- FW: Last Call: 'Operational Security Requirements for IP Network Infrastructure' to BCP
  - From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>

Prev by Date: FW: Last Call: 'Operational Security Requirements for IP Network Infrastructure' to BCP
Next by Date: RE: FW: Last Call: 'Operational Security Requirements for IP Netw ork Infrastructure' to BCP
Previous by thread: FW: Last Call: 'Operational Security Requirements for IP Network Infrastructure' to BCP
Next by thread: RE: FW: Last Call: 'Operational Security Requirements for IP Netw ork Infrastructure' to BCP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread