[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: FW: Last Call: 'Operational Security Requirements for IP Netw ork Infrastructure' to BCP
- To: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>, "Mreview (E-mail)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: RE: FW: Last Call: 'Operational Security Requirements for IP Netw ork Infrastructure' to BCP
- From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:58:10 +0100
Thanks Mike. I have not read the spec yet. I vaguely remembered that
there was quite a bit of system/network management related
discussion at their first BOF (I believe it was in Vienna).
That is why I figured we should look at it from our MIB and NM
perpective. Maybe when I said "MIB doctors" I gave the impression
that it was about MIB work, but it is more to see if there
are NM related topics/issues that concern us.
Thanks,
Bert
> -----Original Message-----
> From: C. M. Heard [mailto:heard@pobox.com]
> Sent: zondag 21 december 2003 5:29
> To: Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: FW: Last Call: 'Operational Security Requirements for IP
> Network Infrastructure' to BCP
>
>
> On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> > I think this doc should be reviewed by a few MIB doctors too!
> > If you can, please do and let me know.
>
> I did not have time to do a real review, but I did try to look for
> MIB-specific issues. However, I could not find any mention of the
> word "MIB" at all, and SNMP is mentioned only as an example.
>
> //cmh
>
>