RE: RE: LLDP port ids

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>]

Actually the LLDP MIB will replace the PTOPO MIB.

Regards,

Dan



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of Harrington, David
> Sent: 25 February, 2004 7:02 PM
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); CONGDON,PAUL (HP-Roseville,ex1)
> Cc: mreview@ops.ietf.org; mlavine@foundrynet.com
> Subject: RE: RE: LLDP port ids
> 
> 
> Hi Bert,
> 
> This discussion is about which is the better IETF object to use in the
> Link Layer Discovery Protocol being developed by the IEEE. 
> LLDP will be
> a standard mechanism to populate the PTOPO MIB.
> 
> I brought the discussion to the mib doctors because I am advising the
> IEEE, the answer is obviously unclear, and I am seeking opinions from
> other mib doctors.
> 
> Can you recommend a better list for my seeking counsel on this?
> 
> dbh
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 11:45 AM
> > To: CONGDON,PAUL (HP-Roseville,ex1)
> > Cc: mreview@ops.ietf.org; mlavine@foundrynet.com
> > Subject: RE: RE: LLDP port ids
> > 
> > [removed those qwho I know to be on mreview list]
> > 
> > Interesting discussion.
> > 
> > Can some one tell me which document this topic belongs to?
> > And is it appropriate to not feed this discussion into the
> > mailing list (group) that actually is working on that 
> > document?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Bert 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
>