[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: RE: LLDP port ids



Thanks Dan and Dave. Now that I understand the context I am happy.

Can I (we) access copies of thoes IEEE documents to find more
context?

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com]
> Sent: woensdag 25 februari 2004 18:05
> To: Harrington, David; Wijnen, Bert (Bert); CONGDON,PAUL
> (HP-Roseville,ex1)
> Cc: mreview@ops.ietf.org; mlavine@foundrynet.com
> Subject: RE: RE: LLDP port ids
> 
> 
> Actually the LLDP MIB will replace the PTOPO MIB.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org 
> > [mailto:owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of Harrington, David
> > Sent: 25 February, 2004 7:02 PM
> > To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); CONGDON,PAUL (HP-Roseville,ex1)
> > Cc: mreview@ops.ietf.org; mlavine@foundrynet.com
> > Subject: RE: RE: LLDP port ids
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Bert,
> > 
> > This discussion is about which is the better IETF object to 
> use in the
> > Link Layer Discovery Protocol being developed by the IEEE. 
> > LLDP will be
> > a standard mechanism to populate the PTOPO MIB.
> > 
> > I brought the discussion to the mib doctors because I am 
> advising the
> > IEEE, the answer is obviously unclear, and I am seeking 
> opinions from
> > other mib doctors.
> > 
> > Can you recommend a better list for my seeking counsel on this?
> > 
> > dbh
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com] 
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 11:45 AM
> > > To: CONGDON,PAUL (HP-Roseville,ex1)
> > > Cc: mreview@ops.ietf.org; mlavine@foundrynet.com
> > > Subject: RE: RE: LLDP port ids
> > > 
> > > [removed those qwho I know to be on mreview list]
> > > 
> > > Interesting discussion.
> > > 
> > > Can some one tell me which document this topic belongs to?
> > > And is it appropriate to not feed this discussion into the
> > > mailing list (group) that actually is working on that 
> > > document?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Bert 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
>