[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: trap design - theory vs practice

To: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: trap design - theory vs practice
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 22:43:49 +0200
Cc: mreview@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.2.20040407230823.022e03f8@127.0.0.1>
Mail-followup-to: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>, mreview@ops.ietf.org
References: <5.2.0.9.2.20040407230823.022e03f8@127.0.0.1>
Reply-to: j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i

On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 11:09:39PM -0700, David T. Perkins wrote:

> Below is a message that describes the current state of the art.
> It's sad.

Many management applications never really got beyond SNMPv1/SMIv1, 
even though the engines parse SMIv2 and handle SNMPv2c and SNMPv3 
packets.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

References:
- Fwd: trap design - theory vs practice
  - From: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>

Prev by Date: Re: trap design - theory vs practice
Next by Date: Please review: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for April 15, 2004 IESG Telechat
Previous by thread: Re: trap design - theory vs practice
Next by thread: Suggestions for MIB browsers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread