RE: Repository for all MIB modules from RFCs

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Nope, that was not the topic of 
  "Alternative procedure for updating MIB modules "

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David T. Perkins [mailto:dperkins@dsperkins.com]
> Sent: maandag 31 mei 2004 18:00
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Repository for all MIB modules from RFCs
> 
> 
> HI,
> 
> Sorry if I read more into what you were saying. That is, I thought
> were saying that the IANA/rfc-editor was to be setting up a
> repository of extracted (and prettified) MIB modules. 
>  
> At 12:31 PM 5/31/2004 +0200, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> >> 
> >> HI,
> >> 
> >> On the following...
> >> 
> >> Been advocating .....
> >> At 10:52 AM 5/30/2004 +0200, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> >> <stuff cut>
> >> 
> >> >The proposal includes a "merged" mib module
> >> >to be available at the I-D repository during WG process and 
> >> >at rfc-editor site when RFC. So the non-expert never has to
> >> >do the pasting from deltas.
> >> >
> >> >Bert
> >> 
> >> ... for over 10 years. So, lets do it.  (And lets get the SMIv1 and
> >> SMIv2 versions there also.)
> >> 
> >Not sure what you mean by the above David.
> >But if you intend to suggest that the RFC-Editor should also put all
> >the MIB modules from the RFCs in that place, then we can 
> discuss that, 
> >but that is a different topic.
> >It will involve a lot of work (to extract and make the 
> current versions
> >available... what about older versions, since you seem to 
> want SMIv1 as well?)
> >and we as MIB doctor should then probably have to chime in to do so.
> >But if you want to pursue, pls take it up as a different subject
> >(I have already changes the subject line assuming this is 
> what you meant).
> >
> >> /david t. perkins 
> >> 
> Regards,
> /david t. perkins 
>