[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Repository for all MIB modules from RFCs
- To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, "Mreview (E-mail)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: Repository for all MIB modules from RFCs
- From: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 08:59:30 -0700
- In-reply-to: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155046791BD@nl0006exch001u.nl .lucent.com>
HI,
Sorry if I read more into what you were saying. That is, I thought
were saying that the IANA/rfc-editor was to be setting up a
repository of extracted (and prettified) MIB modules.
At 12:31 PM 5/31/2004 +0200, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
>>
>> HI,
>>
>> On the following...
>>
>> Been advocating .....
>> At 10:52 AM 5/30/2004 +0200, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
>> <stuff cut>
>>
>> >The proposal includes a "merged" mib module
>> >to be available at the I-D repository during WG process and
>> >at rfc-editor site when RFC. So the non-expert never has to
>> >do the pasting from deltas.
>> >
>> >Bert
>>
>> ... for over 10 years. So, lets do it. (And lets get the SMIv1 and
>> SMIv2 versions there also.)
>>
>Not sure what you mean by the above David.
>But if you intend to suggest that the RFC-Editor should also put all
>the MIB modules from the RFCs in that place, then we can discuss that,
>but that is a different topic.
>It will involve a lot of work (to extract and make the current versions
>available... what about older versions, since you seem to want SMIv1 as well?)
>and we as MIB doctor should then probably have to chime in to do so.
>But if you want to pursue, pls take it up as a different subject
>(I have already changes the subject line assuming this is what you meant).
>
>> /david t. perkins
>>
Regards,
/david t. perkins