RE: Further discussion about IANA Considerations for MIBs

["Michelle S. Cotton" <cotton@icann.org>]

This text looks OK to me, whether it be removed or it 
stays.  As long as we know there is nothing for us to
do once the document is approved.  

Michelle
on behalf of IANA

-----Original Message-----
From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 2:59 AM
To: C. M. Heard; Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
Cc: Michelle S. Cotton; Steve Conte; RFC Editor; Mreview (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Further discussion about IANA Considerations for MIBs


> As for the actual requirement, I saw this an I-D that was posted
> today:
> 
>     This document makes no request of IANA.
> 
>     Note to RFC Editor: this section may be removed on publication
>     as an RFC.
> 
> If left to my own devices, that is what I would tell authors to do
> in such cases.  Does anyone disagree?  If not, that's how I will
> draft the new text.
> 
I think the above is OK (I'll leave it to IANA and/or RFC-Editor to give
final word on that), but at the other hand, I see no harm if the text is 
just left in the RFC. It would be less text in I-D and less work for
RFC-Editor in publication process.

Bert
> Thanks,
> 
> Mike
>