RE: Further discussion about IANA Considerations for MIBs

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

> As for the actual requirement, I saw this an I-D that was posted
> today:
> 
>     This document makes no request of IANA.
> 
>     Note to RFC Editor: this section may be removed on publication
>     as an RFC.
> 
> If left to my own devices, that is what I would tell authors to do
> in such cases.  Does anyone disagree?  If not, that's how I will
> draft the new text.
> 
I think the above is OK (I'll leave it to IANA and/or RFC-Editor to give
final word on that), but at the other hand, I see no harm if the text is 
just left in the RFC. It would be less text in I-D and less work for
RFC-Editor in publication process.

Bert
> Thanks,
> 
> Mike
>