Call for consensus: suggest XXX-TC-MIB for TC MIB modules

["C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>]

On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, C. M. Heard wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> >     Did we ever agree on wanting to have TC modules be of the form
> >     XXXX-TC-MIB ??
> >     If so we should add it.
> 
> Proposal:
> 
> OLD:
>    - The module name should be of the form XXX-MIB, where XXX is a
>      unique prefix (usually all caps with hyphens for separators) that
>      is not used by any existing IETF MIB module.  For example, the MIB
>      module for managing optical interfaces [RFC3591] uses the prefix
>      OPT-IF and has module name OPT-IF-MIB. 
> NEW:
>    - The module name should be of the form XXX-MIB (or XXX-TC-MIB for a
>      module with TCs only), where XXX is a unique prefix (usually all
>      caps with hyphens for separators) that is not used by any existing
>      module.  For example, the module for managing optical interfaces
>      [RFC3591] uses the prefix OPT-IF and has module name OPT-IF-MIB.
> 
> (I have elided a few words because I would like for this appendix to
> fit on a single page).

Please state your opinion.  In the absence of replies I shall leave the
text of Appendix C as-is.

Mike