RE: Pls review documents on IESG Agenda for June 10, 2004 Telecha t

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

They are indeed a bit meager.
I did not raise that issue yet. I wondered... what will
security ADs state. I will at least check today what rest of
IESG thinks.

Thanks for the review Dan!
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com]
> Sent: donderdag 10 juni 2004 10:12
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Pls review documents on IESG Agenda for June 10, 2004
> Telechat
> 
> 
> I find the Security Considerations section of 
> draft-ietf-nat-natmib-09.txt to be 'thinner' than the usual. 
> No indication is being provided about the hazards of 
> mis-configuration or malicious configuration of the 
> read-write objects defined in this MIB module, beyond the 
> generic text from the boilerplate. For example I would expect 
> the text to mention that configuring 
> natNotifThrottlingInterval at a value lower than expected or 
> needed would lead to an unnecessary overflow of notifications, etc.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Dan