RE: Volunteer for MIB Doctor review: draft-ietf-mip6-mipv6-mib-03.txt (fwd)

["C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>]

Just so there are no duplicates ...although I suspect Bert would be
delighted if that were actually to happen :-(

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 22:52:31 +0200
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: C. M. Heard <heard@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Volunteer for MIB Doctor review: draft-ietf-mip6-mipv6-mib-02.txt

No taker yet. SO I will gladly assign it to you.

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: C. M. Heard [mailto:heard@pobox.com]
> Sent: woensdag 21 juli 2004 21:21
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Subject: Re: Volunteer for MIB Doctor review:
> draft-ietf-mip6-mipv6-mib-02.txt
> 
> 
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> > The document is at:
> > 
> >    http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mip6-mipv6-mib-02.txt
> 
> It's http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mip6-mipv6-mib-03.txt
>  
> > Pls let me know if you are interested and on what timescale you
> > can do the review.
> 
> Did you get any takers yet?  If not, I can take a look at it this
> weekend, although I probably won't finish a complete review in one
> day.  I already saw one big red flag, though:
> 
>        IMPORTS
> 
>          [ ... ]
> 
>          ipv6IfIndex
>                     FROM IPV6-MIB
>          ;
> 
> which they usedto index many of the tables.
> 
> Mike
> 
> P.S. One reason I am volunteering is that I need to do a review to
> see how the revised MIB review guidlines work in practice.  There is
> a new version of 2223bis, so we might be approaching closure on that
> front.  More after I have read 2223bis-08.
>