RE: WHo can do MIB doctor review for: draft-ietf-ipsp-spd-mib-01. txt

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

This revision 01 is now in the repository.
It is 65 pages... probably needs serious review.
Harry, if you can review, then I would appreciate that.

I did a very quick check on the beginning of the doc
and already reported:

SMICng tells me:

   W: f(spd.mi2), (67,21) The first revision should match the
      last update for MODULE-IDENTITY spdMIB

Yopu may want to check some otehr dates/timestanmps as well

   E: f(spd.mi2), (215,4) Item "spdEndGroupDirection" has invalid 
      value for MAX-ACCESS
   E: f(spd.mi2), (879,4) Item "spdTrueFilter" must not have items
      registered below it
   W: f(spd.mi2), (2086,20) Item "spdPacketPart" should have SIZE
      specified
   W: f(spd.mi2), (115,4) Textual convention "SpdIPPacketLogging"
      defined but not used

*** 2 errors and 3 warnings in parsing

Sect 4.1.2 is using net 10 addresses as examples.
Pls see RFC3330 for IP addresses to be used in examples.
I.e. they should be in    192.0.2.0/24

I see IPSec at some places. I kniow that at least one of the SEC
ADs wants it to be IPsec!!

Sect 4.1.2 I see
              spdEndGroupRowStatus = 5)           -- createAndGo
Mmm... I though that createAndGo is 4!!

spdIncomingPolicyGroupName is read-write but I see not explanantion 
w.r.t. the persistence behaviour

spdEndGroupStorageType 
  Description clause MUST (according to RFC2579) explain which
  columns must be writable for permanent rows!
same for other StorageType objects

spdEndGroupIdentType
  DESCRIPTION clause says:
           Values of unknown, ipv4z, ipv6z and dns are not legal
           values for this object."
I would like to see that represented in the MODULE-COMPLIANCE.
It even seem you only allow ipv4 and ipv6 given the size constraint
in the InetAddress itself.

The above is just a very very quick scan at the beginning of the document.
I'll see if I can find a MIB doctor for detailed review.

Bert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harrie Hazewinkel [mailto:harrie@lisanza.net]
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 11:01
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Cc: Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: WHo can do MIB doctor review for:
> draft-ietf-ipsp-spd-mib-01.txt
> 
> 
> Hi Bert,
> 
> I just wanted to take a look on the size of the document, but it does
> not seem to be in the repository anymore.
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipsp-spd-mib-01.txt:
> > This Internet-Draft has been deleted. Unrevised documents 
> placed in the
> > Internet-Drafts directories have a maximum life of six months. After
> > that time, they are deleted. This Internet-Draft was not 
> published as
> > an RFC.
> > 
> > The name of the internet-draft was draft-ietf-ipsp-spd-mib-00.txt
> > 
> > Internet-Drafts are not an archival document series, and expired
> > drafts, such as this one, are not available; please do not ask for
> > copies... they are not available. The Secretariat does not have
> > information as to future plans of the authors or working 
> groups WRT the
> > deleted Internet-Draft.
> > 
> > For more information or a copy of the document, contact the 
> author directly.
> > 
> > Draft Author(s):
> > Wesley Hardaker <hardaker@tislabs.com>
> 
> 
> Harrie
>