Question on: draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2013-update-04.txt

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

In document  draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2013-update-04.txt we can
read that it obsoletes RFRCs 2013 and 2454. As a result,
RFC2454 will become historic (at least that is what sect
3.1.2 suggests/states). 

I then see:

   --
   -- { udp 6 } was defined as the ipv6UdpTable in RFC2454's
   -- IPV6-UDP-MIB.  This RFC obsoletes RFC 2454, so { udp 6 } is
   -- obsoleted.
   --

And wonder if it would not be better to pick up the definitions
from RFC2454 and change the status to eitehr deprecated or
obsoleted. That way we create a machine readable form of that
status, whereas otherwise that is kind of vague.

I have no strong opinion on it. 
So I would appreciate input from ther MIB Doctor team and/or
the authors and responsible AD.

Bert