RE: 32-bit and 64-bit counters (fwd)

["C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>]

The one survey that I saw on this subject (which was admittedly a
long time ago) said that the level of deployment of SNMPv2c was much
less than that of SNMPv1.  So it's not necessarily pointless.

On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, David B Harrington wrote:
> I concur. 
> 
> dbh
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org]
> On Behalf Of Juergen Schoenwaelder
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 7:17 AM
> To: David T. Perkins
> Cc: C. M. Heard; Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: 32-bit and 64-bit counters (fwd)
> 
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:44:42PM -0700, David T. Perkins wrote:
>  
> > It's find with me as long as it will be possible for me to update and 
> > submit the old I-D I did on adding support for
> > Counter64 in SNMPv1 as an informational RFC.
> 
> I believe Counter64 is SNMPv1 is pointless since we have SNMPv2c.
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
> <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen,
> Germany