RE: Guidelines for other SDOs

["C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>]

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, David B Harrington wrote:
> I would be satisfied letting the document advance in its
> IETF-specific form, and then start a revision which deals with
> non-IETF guidelines, capturing some of the new MIB Doctor
> experience in non-IETF mib reviews.
> 
> My personal view is that, in general, in the future revision,
> using an appendix to discuss exceptions to the guidelines would
> be far less optimal than modifying or qualifying the guidelines
> inline so they can be applied in both IETF and non-IETF
> environments.

Given the above, I do not plan to put any material on non-IETF MIB
reviews into the next spin of the draft.

Thanks,

Mike