RE: Demoting rfc2223bis to an informative reference

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

The RFC-Editor will cause the doc to stay in queue till 2223bis 
becomes an RFC... and we have no solid outlook for when that may happen.

Bad argument... but... 

Bert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org]On
> Behalf Of Juergen Schoenwaelder
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 13:18
> To: C. M. Heard
> Cc: Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Demoting rfc2223bis to an informative reference
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 03:43:58AM -0800, C. M. Heard wrote:
> > MIB Doctors:
> > 
> > Bert has already looked over the following.  If I hear no objections
> > the proposed modifications will appear in the next spin.
> 
> Can someone explain why a reference to RFC2223bis is bad while a 
> reference to a URL is good? (Sorry for being so ignorant.)
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
> <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 
> 28725 Bremen, Germany
>