[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FW: [mpls] Last Call: 'Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label -Controlled ATM and Frame-Relay Management Interface Definition' to Proposed Standard

To: "Mreview (E-mail)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: FW: [mpls] Last Call: 'Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label -Controlled ATM and Frame-Relay Management Interface Definition' to Proposed Standard
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-reply-to: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15507C4B3F8@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> GEN-ART (The General Area - Area Review Team) has started to
> review documents at IETF Last Call time.
> 
> If we have a volunteer for this one, we can try to do the same?

One question:  hasn't this document been given a MIB Doctor review
before going to IETF Last Call?  I thought that was the policy for
all MIB documents.  Why would it be necessary to do that again at
last call time?

Mike

References:
- FW: [mpls] Last Call: 'Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label -Controlled ATM and Frame-Relay Management Interface Definition' to Prop osed Standard
  - From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>